Washington — When an older veteran leaves the hospital and needs weeks of rehab in a nursing home, the choice of facility can shape how well — and how fast — they recover. A sweeping new federal analysis suggests that, most of the time, that choice goes badly.
Researchers tracked nearly one million hospital-to-nursing-home transitions among veterans nationwide between 2015 and 2022, drawing on records that connect VA care, Medicare and Medicaid stays into a single picture. The results, published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, are hard to square with two decades of public quality ratings: fewer than one in three veterans landed in the highest-rated facility available near their home, and 15% ended up in the worst-rated one.
Better options were usually close by
The numbers get more striking the closer you look. Nearly two-thirds of veterans had at least one higher-quality facility within a short drive than the one they actually used, and more than four in ten had five or more better options to choose from. On average, veterans had more than 16 four-star-or-better facilities within about 16 miles of home. Fewer than half got care at one.
The pattern held steady across the entire eight-year window, which means a decade of star ratings, comparison websites and quality campaigns has barely moved the needle on where veterans actually end up. It also mirrors what federal Medicare advisers found when they looked at the broader beneficiary population, suggesting the problem runs far beyond the VA system.
The disparities are the uncomfortable part
Only about 25% of Black veterans used the best facility available to them, compared with roughly 36% of white veterans. And Black veterans actually had more high-quality options nearby on average. Unmarried veterans, those with heavier illness burdens and those hospitalized for mental or behavioral health conditions showed the same pattern — worse placements despite equal or better access.
Rural veterans tell a paradoxical story. They had far fewer choices — about four high-quality facilities within reach on average, versus 20 for urban veterans — yet they were slightly more likely to pick the best one. When options are scarce, the thinking goes, families and discharge planners scrutinize them harder. When there are plenty, convenience and habit tend to win.
Why better care keeps getting passed over
The researchers point to a three-gate problem: a family must pick a facility, a payer must approve it, and a bed must be open. Hospital discharges are rushed, and families often default to whichever home the hospital team mentions first. Insurance networks narrow the menu — a particular concern as more seniors join Medicare Advantage plans, whose skilled nursing networks have been shown to skew toward lower-rated homes. Bed availability is tightening too, with occupancy back up to 84% nationally and staffing shortages keeping beds empty even where they physically exist.
The stakes are real. Research that follows patients into different facilities has linked higher-rated homes to better recovery, fewer readmissions and fewer adverse events — even among high-risk patients. And the fixes may be simpler than expected: contrary to a common misconception, clinicians are allowed to recommend specific high-quality facilities by name, and many hospital doctors simply are not familiar with the federal Care Compare tool that already ranks every nursing home in the country.
Quality gaps like these are not unique to veterans — a recent analysis of out-of-state chains in Massachusetts found star ratings slipping after acquisitions, another sign that where a resident lands matters as much as how care is delivered once they arrive. For the VA, researchers say the next step is mapping its post-acute markets to figure out where its unusual dual role — both provider and payer — could steer veterans toward care that, in most cases, is already just down the road.
Discover more from Skilled Care Journal
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
