Wednesday, March 11

Bronx, New York — A 490-bed nursing home in the Bronx is asking a federal court to block a $31 million Medicare recoupment, arguing the repayment demand is based on an audit that misread pandemic-era billing rules and could force the facility to shut down.

Pinnacle Multicare filed suit in federal court after the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services moved to recover the money following an Office of Inspector General audit of claims from 2020 and 2021. According to court filings, federal auditors found errors in 99 of 100 sampled reimbursement submissions and then used those findings to project a much larger repayment amount across a two-year period.

The facility says that approach ignored the reality of the early COVID period, when guidance was shifting fast and providers were relying on emergency waivers while trying to keep residents in place and hospitals from being overwhelmed. Pinnacle argues auditors applied standards that either changed later or did not fully account for the flexibilities facilities were operating under at the time.

The lawsuit also targets the speed and structure of the repayment demand. Pinnacle said CMS followed the watchdog’s recommendation with a letter warning that if the full amount was not paid by Feb. 27, interest would begin accruing at 11.625% — nearly $10,000 a day. The operator argues that timeline denied it a meaningful chance to challenge the findings before facing devastating financial consequences.

In the complaint, Pinnacle said the repayment order would leave it unable to meet payroll and could put a critical care site for New York City residents at risk. The operator also argues the audit process lacked basic transparency because it did not clearly identify the basis for each overpayment finding in a way that would allow the facility to respond claim by claim.

The case matters beyond one building. Industry leaders have already been warning about the broader shift in federal nursing home enforcement, and Pinnacle’s challenge could become an early test of how aggressively regulators can push repayment actions tied to Patient Driven Payment Model claims from the pandemic period.

Federal officials did not provide detail on other active audits in the same series, but the watchdog said additional reviews remain underway. That means providers across the sector will be watching closely to see whether courts accept Pinnacle’s argument that the government is trying to judge emergency-era care with rules that came later.

Share.

Leave a Comment

Discover more from Skilled Care Journal

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading